Comments

• 04/15/2018 - 07:05 edited 04/15/2018 - 07:07

  Groucho Marx Member Posts: 8

  The request body format looks the same, so I wonder what the difference is. Besides I tried the following steps

  • setZone (master M, slave S1)
  • setZone (master M, slave S2)
    and the result was: master M was happily adding S2 to its zone, now consisting of S1 and S2.
    Maybe addZoneSlave is outdated or I am missing something?

  0
• 04/17/2018 - 17:18

  [email protected] Admin Posts: 169

  Hi Groucho,

  Turns out, you're totally right. You can just use /setZone to add to existing groups; technically, the master will then itself send an /addZoneSlave command to the intended new device to actually make the addition, but it working only with /setZone can make the process simpler. I'm going to look into updating our documentation to make this clearer.

  And for additional clarity: for anyone using /addZoneSlave, have no fear, support for that endpoint is not changing and you won't need to make any changes to your app to use /setZone instead.

  Thanks Groucho for raising this question and helping us improve our documentation (I know this is the second time you've helped us out in this way)!

  1
• 04/18/2018 - 14:32

  Groucho Marx Member Posts: 8

  Fine! Thanks for your quick reply.

  0